Gwybodaeth Modiwlau

Module Identifier
IPM2120
Module Title
POLITICAL RESEARCH: PHILOSOPHY, METHODS AND APPLICATION
Academic Year
2008/2009
Co-ordinator
Semester
Semester 2

Course Delivery

 

Assessment

Assessment Type Assessment length / details Proportion
Semester Assessment 1 Seminar Presentation  1 Seminar Presentation (accompanied by a one-page summary of the presentation)  10%
Semester Assessment 1 x 3000 word review esaay  1 x 3000 - word review essay (required to address a number of issues detailed in the learning outcomes)  50%
Semester Assessment 1 x 1500 word bibliographical essay  40%
Supplementary Exam Students may, subject to Faculty approval, have the opportunity to resit this module, normally during the supplementary examination period. For further clarification please contact the Teaching Programme Administrator in the Department of International Politics. 

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this module, students should be able to:
1. Demonstrate ¿ through a 3000-word review essay ¿ an ability to subject a book-length research monograph to critical scrutiny ¿ in particular, (1) to identify, with precision, the central question(s) it addresses, (2) to give a relevantly detailed summary of its main argument, (3) evaluate the quality of the argument that produces the conclusions, and (4) to discuss the implications of the conclusions reached.
2. Communicate the above ability in a preliminary manner also by a 15-minute oral seminar presentation, accompanied by an appropriate handout, and through discussions in the subsequent Q and A session.
3. Demonstrate ¿ through a 1500-word bibliographical essay ¿ an ability to summarise succinctly the broad strands of literature that relate to the student¿s research topic or an ability to assess the relative importance of the work to be reviewed in a more general context of the body of literature to which the work belongs. (See further the guidelines on the bibliographical essay below.)
4. Demonstrate an understanding of the similarities and differences between different kinds of research conducted in the subfields of study encompassed by the Department of International Politics in the light of an explicitly argued-for theory of knowledge; explain the character of the work reviewed within the (theory-of-knowledge) framework adopted; and compare this to the character of the students¿ own projects.
5. Demonstrate an understanding of the variety of research methods employed in the fields of study encompassed by the Department of International Politics and of their relevance to the range of research questions that arise in the fields.
6. Demonstrate an understanding of the variety of presentational structures (chapter divisions, charts, tables, notes and references) and the range of ways of writing (analytic, academic, personal, etc.) that a research monograph may take and justify the intended choice of a particular structure (or range of structures) for the students¿ own dissertations.
7. Demonstrate an understanding of key philosophical/epistemological/methodological debates in social science and history that have had a formative influence on their specialized disciplines.

8. Demonstrate, as appropriate, an understanding of legal and ethical issues that relate to the research that led to the production of the monograph under review and to their own research.

Brief description

This module reinforces the University's provision of postgraduate research training in social sciences, by adding to the faculty-level training another layer of research training specific to the multiple subfields of study encompassed by the Department of International Politics (for example, European and Welsh Politics, Intelligence Studies, International History, International Relations, International Relations Theory, Postcolonial Politics, Security Studies, and Strategic Studies).

The module follows the ESRC guidelines, according to which the ['o]utlets are encouraged to be flexible in the way they structure and deliver their research training' and offers subject-specific research methods training to MSc and Research Students in the Department of International Politics that is '[a]s far as possible' made relevant to the student's own research area' [ESRC Guidelines, Section E11, 4.1]

Aims

This module aims to provide students with an opportunity to learn about (1) the variety of ways in which research questions are formulated in the academic subfields encompassed by the Department of International Politics, (2) modes and methods of enquiry and argumentation that exist in these subfields, and (3) how the process and outcome of research may be presented/defended. Special attention is paid to philosophical, epistemological and methodological dimensions of research processes. The central aim is to get the students to investigate and discuss these issues in the context of research conducted in the relevant subfields and in relation to the research undertaken by the students themselves.

Content

1) Although a few seminars are given by the tutor, who will also lead all discussions and interrogative dialogues that follow student presentations, the module is student-led to a great extent (as explained below).

2) It requires each student to give a full oral presentation and encourages all of them to participate in the Q and A session that follows, thereby enhancing their transferable presentation and oral skills.

3) Through individual presentations, essays and seminar discussions, it deepens the students' understandings of a wide range of epistemological or methodological orientations (critical, hermeneutic, positivist, post-positivist, poststructural, feminist) and methods of data collection and analysis (including quantitative, qualitative, historical, and philosophical) as currently practiced in the subfields of study encompassed by the Department of International Politics.

4) It enables students to progress step by step through three stages of assessment: (a) initial oral presentation with full feedback within a week, (b) a bibliographical essay (which attempts to embed the general literature survey skills in the context of the student¿s own research), and (c) a full-length critical review essay on a book of their choice usually expected to be based on doctoral research in each student's own subfield (which aims to embed the skills of close reading of texts in the context of the student's own research).

5) It offers the students an opportunity to scrutinize concrete examples of how various research methods (which they learn about at the faculty-level research training) work, and learn from good research practices that lead to the publication of research monographs in their subfields.

6) It offers an opportunity to discuss closely any aspects of their research training with the module convenor during her office hours or by appointment, which many students taking this module find invaluable.

Transferable skills

Research skills
One of the central aims of this module is to require/enable students to develop the key skills in social science research, i.e., close, critical, engagement with a text - to distil and outline the central features of a text, contextualise the work, evaluate its argument/conclusion, and present the outcome in an essay form. The texts are research monographs (typically based on successful PhD theses), and students can learn from them how to (as well as how not to) do research and present its outcomes. Students are also required to write a brief bibliographical essay and this enhances their literature survey skills.

Problem-solving
Each student is given a problem to solve (or a task to perform), as outlined in the learning outcomes section above, within a given period of time, both orally and in writing. The problem/task, in brief, is to produce a (contextualized and self-reflective) critique of a chosen text, the meaning of which is spelled out in the learning outcomes section above, and is central to any intellectual activity at an advanced level, at which postgraduate students engage in research.

Communication
The presentation of work should reflect effective expression of ideas and good use of language skills in order to ensure clarity, coherence and effective communication.

Information technology
Students are required to submit their work in word-processed format. Also, students will be encouraged to search for sources of information on the web, as well as seeking sources through electronic information sources (such as BIDS and OCLC).

Improving own learning and performances [Not assessed]
The module aims to promote self-management but within a context of assistance from both the teachers and the fellow students alike. Students will be expected to improve their own learning and performance by undertaking their own study and to exercise their own initiative. The need to conduct a seminar presentation and to meet an essay deadline will focus students' attention on the need to manage their time and opportunity resources well.

Team work [Not assessed]
There is no team working involved in this module other than that the students are expected to give presentations within the time limit allocated and take part in the discussion in the class room in a civil and intellectually productive manner.

Personal development and career planning [Not assessed]
The discussions in particular will help to develop students' verbal and presentation skills. Writing essays in time and preparing for an oral presentation will contribute towards their portfolio of transferable skills.

Reading List

General Text
Fay, Brian. (1996 (various p) Contemporary philosophy of social science :a multicultural approach /Brian Fay. Blackwell Primo search Hay, Colin (2002.) Political analysis /Colin Hay. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/hol031/2002020889.html Palgrave Moses, Jonathon Wayne (2007.) Ways of knowing :competing methodologies and methods in social and political research /Jonathon W. Moses and Torb rn L. Knutsen. Palgrave Macmillan Primo search

Notes

This module is at CQFW Level 7