Module Identifier LA36720  
Module Title MEDICINE, ETHICS AND LAW  
Academic Year 2006/2007  
Co-ordinator Professor John R Williams  
Semester Semester 2  
Other staff Mrs Elizabeth J Stieler, Dr Naomi J Salmon  
Pre-Requisite LA10110 or LA30110 or LA15710  
Co-Requisite LA36030  
Course delivery Lecture    
  Lecture   30 Hours. Two one hour and one two hour lecture per week  
  Seminars / Tutorials   6 Hours. Three two hour seminars during the semester  
Assessment
Assessment TypeAssessment Length/DetailsProportion
Semester Exam2 Hours  100%
Supplementary Exam2 Hours 2hr resit exam  100%
Professional Exemptions Not Required for Professional Purposes  

Learning outcomes

On successful completion of this module students should be able to:
Students are expected to have developed an appreciation of the issues both in terms of their relevance to abstract philosophical concerns, scientific developments and social policy, and to practical legal principles and practice.

Intellectual Skills

1. Analytical skills
2. Problem solving
3. Constructing argument
4. Synthesis (ethics, law and medicine)
5. Assessing and interpreting evidence and source material (interdisciplinary)
6. Organisation of ideas
7. Critical evaluation of complex and conflicting argument and evidence
8. Understanding relevance and irrelevance (especially with regard to making students aware that their gut reaction to issues is largely irrelevant).


Brief description

This module considers the relationship between law and ethics dealing in detail with such issues as confidentiality, medical negligence, consent to medical treatment, resource allocation, euthanasia, assisted conception, abortion and mental health. Medical ethics has always been a subject of major concern to practitioners and these issues arise throughout medical practice. The most divisive and complex issues concerning medical ethics turn around questions of life and death which will be considered in depth through abortion, euthanasia and assisted conception. Issues of life and death are pervasive and increasingly become discussed not merely as philosophical medical and legal problems, but also as a resource issue. Medical care is a costly enterprise and choices must be made concerning priorities. On what basis should such decisions be made? These and other general ethical issues will form the basis of the course. They will then be developed in relation to particular issues. Those chosen are indicative of the most sensitive issues, they do not form an exhaustive list. The intention of the course is to introduce these dilemmas and consider and evaluate their legal, ethical and practical implications.

People are today living longer, often due to advancements in medical science, yet this increased life expectancy may not always be considered a blessing. Should a patient be allowed to choose to die? In what circumstances will the law protect the respective rights of a pregnant woman and her foetus? A number of recent cases have highlighted the extent to which the medical profession is confronted with such issues.

Medicine is an imprecise science and calls for a clinical judgement. To what extent should society penalise doctors for their mistakes? An over-punitive legal regime can lead doctors to exercise too much caution and can lead to defensive medicine. However, too lax a regime creates the impression that doctors are a law unto themselves. How should medicine be regulated?

Patients who are mentally incompetent will need particular care. They can neither agree to, nor refuse treatment. The court's power to intervene is ambiguous in the case of an adult and the next-of-kin can do no more than express an opinion. Case law declares that the doctor would not be acting unlawfully if she or he acts in their patients "best interests". Who should decide what is in their best interests? Has recent legislation improved the plight of those who lack capacity?

It is estimated that one in six couples is infertile. There are many forms of treatment for infertility, each one posing very difficult ethical questions. Do people have a right to a child? Who should be eligible for treatment? To what extent should we be able to determine the sex of a child or his or her genetic composition?

The module will give recognition to the split between self regulation by the medical profession and the potential need for external regulation whether by law or other means. The difficulties raised in attempting to reconcile the ethical dilemmas of medical practice with the prescriptive approach of the law will be highlighted.

Aims

This module aims to provide students with a sound foundation in the legal principles and philosophical questions underlying medico-legal decision making in the courts and related forums.

Content

Topics covered will include some of the following:

Introduction to Ethics

Medical Negligence

Medical Records and Confidentiality

Provision of Healthcare in the NHS

Consent

Abortion and neonates

Euthanasia

Assisted Conception

Cloning

Mental Health

Reading Lists

Books
** Recommended Text
Gillon Philosophical Medical Ethics
Mason & McCall Smith, Mennedy & Grubb Medical Law
Montgomery Health Care Law
Sheldon & Thomson Feminist Perspectives on Healthcare Law
Stauch, Wheat & Tingle Sourcebook on Medical Law
Students will be advised of the latest edition of texts in the first lecture

Notes

This module is at CQFW Level 6