Assessment Criteria for Essays and Examinations (Content Modules)
% | Knowledge and Understanding of the Subject | Use of External Sources/Referencing | Structure of Answer | Relevance | Language and Expression |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
70+ | An extensive knowledge of the subject area and a full understanding of the topic/s taught. | Very strong evidence of reading and independent research using reliable resources, referenced correctly. | Ability to introduce a sophisticated argument, presented in a coherent, clear and logical manner. | An ability to concentrate fully on the task in hand and show an awareness of what is relevant and significant. | Shows a strong grasp of the language used, along with sophisticated style. |
60-69 | Substantial knowledge of the subject area and a good understanding of the topic/s taught. | Good evidence of reading and independent research using reliable resources, mostly referenced correctly. | Ability to introduce a clear argument, presented fairly coherently, clearly and logically. | The ability to concentrate on the task in hand and show awareness of what is relevant and significant. | Shows a good grasp of the language used, with an appropriate vocabulary and style. |
50-59 | Competent knowledge of the subject area and a reasonable understanding of the topic/s taught. | Some evidence of reading and independent research using mainly reliable resources. Referencing exists but may not always be correct. | The ability to present an argument but with some difficulty regarding coherence, clarity and logic. | Some ability to concentrate on the task in hand with a tendency to digress and include irrelevant elements. | A fair grasp of the language used. Obvious infelicities which may impede meaning and detract from style. Sufficient but undeveloped vocabulary. |
40-49 | Rudimentary knowledge of the subject area and limited understanding of the topic/s taught. | Little evidence of reading and independent research. | Some ability to present arguments, but unable to develop argument clearly, coherently and logically. | Some ability to concentrate on the task in hand with a marked tendency to digress and include irrelevant elements. | An elementary grasp of the language used. Frequent mistakes which impede meaning and style. Poor vocabulary. |
0-39 | Lack of knowledge of the subject area and little understanding of the topic/s taught. | No evidence of reading and independent research. | Obvious inability to present an argument. | Obvious inability to concentrate on the task in hand | Inability to write coherently in the language used. |
*These assessment criteria are intended only as general guidelines for examiners and students. In cases where students demonstrate a combination of strengths and weaknesses examiners will exercise their judgement in awarding a final mark