|Delivery Type||Delivery length / details|
|Lecture||16 Hours total|
|Seminars / Tutorials||3 Hours = 3 x 1 hour seminars.|
|Assessment Type||Assessment length / details||Proportion|
|Semester Assessment||Essay of 2,000 words||100%|
|Supplementary Assessment||Essay of 2,000 words||100%|
On successful completion of this module students should be able to:
Learn to identify, understand and explain the main rules of evidence.
Understand the theories and principles underlying these rules.
Critically analyse the effictiveness of the law.
Identify evidential issues in problem scenarios, state the applicable principles and apply them to a novel fact scenario.
Critically debate issues and present a balanced and coherent argument.
The law of evidence governs the methods by which matters may be proved for the purposes of legal proceedings. It is therefore a subject of considerable practical importance, and one which impinges on almost every other area of law. Having the substantive law on your side (or on the side of your client) will be of little use if you cannot persuade the court or jury to believe your version of the facts, but you cannot do this unless you know what evidence will be acceptable to the court, and how it may be presented. English law does not apply the continental doctrine of "free appreciation of evidence". Instead, it applies a number of strict rules, prohibiting the use of certain kinds of evidence, even in some cases where common sense might suggest that they would be highly relevant. Other rules govern the examination and cross-examination of witnesses, and determine whether the testimony of a particular witness requires corroboration or support before it can be relied upon. These rules are often open to serious criticism, but must nevertheless be identified and understood. If an original document has been lost, will the court accept a copy instead? Will it accept the evidence of a young child? If an alleged rapist has previous convictions for sexual assault, should the jury be told? Would it make any difference if he was claiming to be of good character? Can inferences be drawn from the failure of a defendant to testify at his trial, or from his failure to answer questions following arrest? Does it matter whether evidence has been obtained by improper means? Should it matter, and if so why? The law of evidence also prescribes the allocation of the burden of proof as between the parties to litigation, and the standard of proof that must be satisfied. As a general rule, it is for the prosecution to discharge the burden of proof in criminal cases, and for the plaintiff or petitioner to do so in civil cases; but the general rule is littered with express and implied exceptions, which can make the study of this topic anything but straightforward.
The course will be taught by the usual system of lectures and seminars. The lectures will provide an introduction to the various topics, together with a fairly significant amount of detailed information, criticism and analysis. The handouts do not, however, include detailed case summaries, and must not be seen as substitutes for library research or textbooks. Seminars will provide students with the opportunity to examine particular areas in greater detail, and will provide practical guidance on problem solving.
Principle Topics included in the Syllabus:
1. Introduction to the Law of Evidence
2. Relevance, Proof and Facts
3. The Burden of Proof
4. Identification Evidence
6. Illegally, Improperly and Unfairly Obtained Evidence
7. Evidence of Bad Character
Reading ListRecommended Text
Raymond N Emson (1999) Evidence Macmillan Law Masters Primo search Blackstone's Statutes on Evidence Primo search Consult For Futher Information
Andrews, JA & Hirst, M (2001) Andrews and Hirst on Criminal Evidence 4th ed. Primo search Ormerod and Hooper Blackstones Criminal Practice 2000, Section F Primo search Criminal Law Review Primo search
This module is at CQFW Level 6