Due to Covid-19 students should refer to the module Blackboard pages for assessment details
|Assessment Type||Assessment length / details||Proportion|
|Semester Exam||2 Hours Unseen exam||50%|
|Semester Assessment||2500 word essay||50%|
|Supplementary Exam||2 Hours Resit failed or missed unseen exam||50%|
|Supplementary Assessment||Resubmit failed or missed 2500 word essay||50%|
On successful completion of this module students should be able to:
1. Students are expected to have developed an appreciation of the issues both in terms of their relevance to abstract philosophical concerns, scientific developments and social policy, and to practical legal principles and practice.
2. Assess and interpret evidence and source material (interdisciplinary).
3. Evaluation of complex and conflicting argument and evidence.
People are today living longer, often due to advancements in medical science, yet this increased life expectancy may not always be considered a blessing. Should a patient be allowed to choose to die? In what circumstances will the law protect the respective rights of a pregnant woman and her foetus? A number of cases highlight the extent to which the medical profession is confronted with such issues.
Medicine is an imprecise science and calls for a clinical judgement. To what extent should society penalise doctors for their mistakes? An over-punitive legal regime can lead doctors to exercise too much caution and can lead to defensive medicine. However, too lax a regime creates the impression that doctors are a law unto themselves. How should medicine be regulated?
Patients who are mentally incompetent will need particular care. They can neither agree to, nor refuse treatment. The court's power to intervene is ambiguous in the case of an adult and the next-of-kin can do no more than express an opinion. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 declares that the doctor would not be acting unlawfully if she or he acts in their patients "best interests". Who should decide what is in their best interests? Has this legislation improved the plight of those who lack capacity?
It is estimated that one in six couples is infertile. There are many forms of treatment for infertility, each one posing very difficult ethical questions. Do people have a right to a child? Who should be eligible for treatment? To what extent should we be able to determine the sex of a child or his or her genetic composition?
The module will give recognition to the split between self regulation by the medical profession and the potential need for external regulation whether by law or other means. The difficulties raised in attempting to reconcile the ethical dilemmas of medical practice with the prescriptive approach of the law will be highlighted.
2. Medical Negligence
3. Medical Records and Confidentiality
4. Provision of Healthcare in the NHS
6. Abortion and neonates
8. Assisted Conception
10. Mental Health
30 x 1 hour lectures
6 x 1 hour seminars
|Skills Type||Skills details|
|Application of Number||N/A|
|Communication||Seminar discussions will develop individual and group presentation and oral argument.|
|Improving own Learning and Performance||Seminar participation and exam preparation will develop different aspects of personal academic development, from understanding and referencing sources through to the dissemination of ideas to others orally, and via written communication skills.|
|Information Technology||Library and research skills are fundamental to preparation for seminars and exam.|
|Personal Development and Career planning||Library and research skills are fundamental to preparation for seminars and exam.|
|Problem solving||Preparation for seminars and exams will involve problem scenarios for students to tackle.|
|Research skills||These skills will be developed through preparation for seminars and the exam.|
|Subject Specific Skills||Reading and understanding relevant materials in the field of Medical Law|
|Team work||Group activities and discussion in seminars|
This module is at CQFW Level 5